Independent guide. Not affiliated with the IRS, SEC, any state filing office, or any CPA firm. Not legal, tax, or financial advice. Last reviewed May 2026.

State Deep Dive

C Corp vs S Corp in California

California imposes the highest combined S corp cost of any US state: an $800 minimum franchise tax (paid every year regardless of income), a 1.5 percent S corp franchise tax on net income, and no state conformity to the federal QSBS Section 1202 exclusion. The math may flip the federal-only S corp decision for California operators.

Updated May 2026. Not tax advice.

California numbers at a glance

Minimum franchise tax

$800

Both C and S corps

S corp tax rate

1.5%

Of net income

C corp tax rate

8.84%

Of net income

The $800 minimum franchise tax

Every California corporation (C or S) and LLC pays an $800 minimum franchise tax to the Franchise Tax Board each year, regardless of income. Paid by April 15 for calendar-year filers. First-year exemption for corporations was extended through 2024 then ended; for entities formed 2025 onward, the $800 minimum applies in the first year. Verify current first-year rules at the FTB.

This is independent of the percentage-based franchise tax. An S corp with $100,000 net income pays the greater of $800 minimum or 1.5% of net income ($1,500), so it owes $1,500.

Source: California FTB S Corporations

The 1.5% S corp franchise tax

California imposes a 1.5 percent franchise tax on the net income of S corporations, on top of the personal income tax shareholders pay on the pass-through K-1. This is unusual: most states either tax the S corp shareholders only (pass-through) or treat the S corp like a C corp at the entity level. California does both.

For a California S corp with $500,000 net income, the entity owes $7,500 in state franchise tax (1.5 percent of $500k). Shareholders then pay California personal income tax on the same $500,000 on their personal returns at marginal rates up to 13.3 percent. The combined California cost may exceed $74,000 on $500k of S corp income.

Worked example: $400k profit California operator

LineS CorpC Corp
Net income$400,000$400,000
Federal corporate tax$0 pass-through$84,000 (21%)
CA franchise tax$6,000 (1.5%)$35,360 (8.84%)
Federal personal tax on $400k~$95,000 (varies)$0 if reinvested
CA personal tax on $400k~$33,000 (avg ~8.3%)$0 if reinvested
SE-tax saving above salary~$10,000N/A
Total California cost (entity only)$6,000$35,360

Indicative example. Personal tax depends on filing status, deductions, and total income. PTET workaround (next section) may reduce the impact for S corp owners.

The PTET workaround for SALT cap

California adopted Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) in 2021 under AB 150 (codified at Cal. Rev. and Tax. Code Sections 17052.10, 19900-19906). S corps and partnerships may elect to pay an entity-level 9.3 percent tax on qualified net income; the federal deduction at the entity level effectively bypasses the $10,000 SALT cap for shareholders.

For a California S corp with $400,000 of qualified net income, the PTET election pays $37,200 at the entity level, and shareholders receive a credit on their California personal returns for the same amount, while taking the federal deduction at the entity level. The net federal tax saving may exceed $13,000 for the shareholder. The PTET election was extended through tax year 2030 by SB 113.

Source: California FTB Pass-Through Entity Elective Tax

California does not conform to QSBS Section 1202

One of the strongest C corp arguments (federal QSBS exclusion of up to $10M or 10x basis) provides no California state tax benefit. A California-resident founder selling C corp QSBS for $10M owes zero federal capital gains tax but pays California personal income tax at marginal rates up to 13.3 percent on the full gain.

For founders building a venture-track company, the QSBS state nonconformity often means establishing residence in a QSBS-conforming state (Texas, Florida, Washington) before sale. This is a residency planning issue, not an entity choice issue.

Source: Cal. Rev. and Tax. Code Sections 17152 and 18152.5 (California QSBS conformity history). California QSBS rules were invalidated by Cutler v Franchise Tax Board (193 Cal.App.4th 960, 2012) and the legislature subsequently allowed the deferral provisions to expire.

Sources

Educational only. Consult a California CPA for your specific situation. PTET elections have deadlines that vary by tax year.

Updated 2026-05-11